Yes indeed there are many traffic snafus here in Treasure Valley land. As
a cyclist, pedestrian, motorcyclist and automobile driver, I have to say that I
sympathize to some degree with all parties. When I am in a car, I am constantly
watching out for pedestrians, while often being upset that they are in my way
and slowing me down. When I am walking I get frustrated at people who pull up
to crosswalks and never fully stop while I am trying to cross. While on my
bicycle riding in traffic I get frustrated at the few a--holes who try to run
me off the road or do other things they feel are intimidating, yet in my car I
get frustrated at cyclists when I don't feel I know what they are going to do.
On my motorcycle I am always trying to spot people doing stupid things, just so
I can avoid deathtrap situations, but I am often annoyed by motorcyclists who
act as if they own the road, or who speed past me to make sure I understand
they are faster.
The trouble for me is to keep in mind what I feel as a
pedestrian when I am driving, or trying to remember all the cycling laws while
I am in a car. The fact is that each member of the traffic community, whether
ped, cycle, motorcycle, or car, and we all have an equal responsibility to know
the rights, privileges, responsibilities and rules for the other members. It
may seem like a lot to keep in mind while on the road, but I think that if
people would focus on making the rules of driving a priority when they were
driving rather than the hoard of other things that take over (i.e. cellphones,
texting, eating, kids fighting in the back seat, the scenery, your partner,
smoking, the radio, et cetera), they would find that the rules and laws are not
so difficult to understand or remember, nor are they difficult to adhere to.
The fact is, most everyone--walkers, riders, drivers--has somewhere to be, and
they are all trying to figure out what corners to cut to make it there a little
faster. Usually it is at the intersection of cutting corners and being
distracted where bad things happen.
Now that I have said all of that, there are some basic rules
to keep in mind that govern most situations.
1) The bigger the rig, the fewer the rights
Contrary to what many drivers of large vehicles would have
us believe, they neither own the road nor have the most rights on the road. In
fact, the larger the vehicle, the fewer the rights and greater the
responsibility to vehicles that are smaller and pedestrians. The greatest
privileges accorded to any traffic participant are those possessed by the
pedestrian. Larger vehicles can inflict more damage quicker, and are feared
because of that. Many who drive large vehicles use that fear to their
advantage, intimidating smaller cars and pedestrians. Yet as the vehicle grows
in size, because of the damage it can inflict, the responsibility to drive
slower and safer grows. For if the intimidation fails to move someone out of
the way in time, the driver of the large vehicle can suddenly find himself
serving hard time for manslaughter and reckless driving. Similarly, these
larger vehicles are more likely to be accused of fault in an accident, and the
liability in an at-fault accident is greater because they inflict greater
damage. Large vehicles are granted only the basic rights of any traffic
participant, and they must adhere to a greater number of laws (weight, height,
width, covers over loads, slowing or stopping for railroads, etc).
2) Be assertive, not stupid
I am not condoning aggressive driving, but if we want people
to be more careful around pedestrians, as pedestrians we need to assert
ourselves and own our rights. A great part of this is embracing the rights we
have and using them to our advantage rather than behaving illegally and irresponsibly.
A good way to be assertive as a pedestrian would be to use the crosswalk. What
I mean is that in order for vehicles to stop, the pedestrian must be in the
crosswalk. This means taking a step off of that curb when the vehicle has
adequate time to stop, making eye contact with the driver in such a way as to
convey the message that you intend to step in front of him. Stare him down
until he stop or slows enough to let you walk, then walk in front of him.
Another way is to use unmarked crosswalks. every intersection has a crosswalk,
whether it is marked or otherwise, and every pedestrian is accorded the rights
to using that crosswalk. Only in cases where there is a sign indicating
otherwise does a pedestrian have to go elsewhere. Every intersection has a
crosswalk that runs perpendicular to the traffic lanes, or the shortest route
across one road at a time. (for instance, those funky intersections where the
cross street is offset by a few feet, or comes in diagonally). This means that
once the pedestrian steps off the sidewalk onto the intersection, he is in a
crosswalk and traffic must stop. I encourage pedestrians to reasonably assert
their rights in this area, drivers are oblivious to the law that requires this,
and until pedestrians start participating in their rights, it won't change.
(disclaimer: I do not advocate running in front of traffic randomly, a person
has to give cars time to stop, etc and if the cars are not stopping, then the
pedestrian obviously should wait).
3) Cyclists are cars…sort of
Okay,
cyclists, this one is for you. You have all of the
responsibilities of a car, but without a guaranteed designated lane of
traffic.
On the other hand, you can roll through stop signs and lighted right
hand turns.
After stopping for a red light and determining that it is safe to
proceed, you
can go through the intersection. You can be a car, or a pedestrian with
the
rights and privileges of each in specific instances. But you are also
responsible, as would be a car on the road, to yield to pedestrians when
on the
sidewalk. Cyclists, you have the right to the shoulder of any road, and
when
the shoulder is not navigable you have a right to the rightmost lane of
traffic
(or the left if a multi-lane one way). Cars are required to yield to you
if
they cannot safely pass you on the left with reasonable distance. And
you can
pass cars on the left if they are not moving fast enough and you need to
get
by. Yet it’s not all fun and games. Cyclists are required to have a
headlight
and taillight (or reflector) when riding on roadways after sunset and
before
sunrise, or when conditions are dark enough they could not be easily
seen from
500 feet. Like cars, cyclists are required to stop for peds in
crosswalks or
sidewalks. Cyclists also are required, when on roadways, to behave like a
motorized vehicle (with the exceptions of stop signs and lights, which
allow
some freedom). Cyclists are also required, by law, to exercise "due
care" and not cause traffic problems. This means that negligence on the
part of the cyclist can end up very, very badly.
4) Cars, cars, and more cars
So here’s the deal with passenger cars and pickups, the largest
population on the road: they feel the most suppressed. As a car owner and
driver, I feel like big vehicles are trying to crush me and the laws don’t
allow me any real privileges to offset that feeling. I feel like I am supposed
to be looking out for everyone on the road and no one is looking out for me. It’s
brutal out there. Even the cops have it out for me. Because the standard set of
motor vehicle laws are all written based on passenger cars, there are a whole
lot of laws to obey and really no breaks. The passenger car (or pickup) must stop
for pedestrians, yield to cyclists, watch out for big rigs, signal every lane
change, watch the speed, but don’t take eyes off the road. The payoff for all
of this work is that it is the group most likely to be at fault in an accident.
Sadly, for the passenger car, there is very little reprieve. The passenger car’s
only hope is that in an accident, the other guy did something stupid or illegal.
As
far as tips go for the driver of passenger cars, just because you own
popular power doesn't make you right. Don't abuse your responsibility to
other members of the traffic community. You do have a responsibility to
stop for pedestrians, whether in a marked
or unmarked crosswalk. You can’t pass a cyclist who for whatever reason
is
riding in the lane of traffic, unless oncoming traffic is clear and you
can go
around him like you would another car. Don’t do dumb stuff like try and
figure out
Google Maps on your smartphone while driving. Don’t slow to a crawl
because you
don’t want to miss your turn, you will cause an accident. In that case,
if you
pass your turn, go around the block and come back to it. If you are
mapping a
route on your phone, or texting, or even talking, please, PLEASE, pull
over.
5) Those darned bikers…
Motorcyclists have only one extra privilege that I am aware
of beyond the rights of automobiles and that is that they are allowed, after
waiting an entire light cycle without being signaled, due to a malfunction of
the sensor because it didn’t detect the motorcycle, to proceed through the
intersection when it is safe, even on a red light. Whoopee! But the reality for
the motorcyclist is that he knows that his life is at risk every time he enters
the road. The only real advantage that the motorcyclist has is that the removal
of all of the distractions that would be normal in a car allow him to be more focused; and hee needs
every ounce of that focus to stay alive. The motorcycle rider has to be
expecting, at every moment, the most hazardous potential situation.
For motorcycles it doesn’t stop with watching speed, direction, and a few other
cars, he has to also watch for sand, water and other slippery hazards on the
road surface, he has to have a plan for safely ditching off the road if someone
doesn’t see him. He has to be conscious of the blind spots of other vehicles
and not ride into them. He has to behave as if everyone doesn’t see him, while
riding confidently and assertively so that people will see him. And he has to
do all of this while being pelted by road crud from the car in front of him and
keeping his bike upright. I don’t know how motorcyclists would stay alive at
all if they figured out a way to text and motorcycle.
There is really only one reason that anyone would be insane enough to ride a motorcycle, and that is that they love to ride a motorcycle. It isn’t worth the risk or the trouble for any other reason.
So this is really, really long. I put it in story form, however, because it is more memorable than quoting title, chapter and section of state code. The facts, however, are all accurate to what state code says in Idaho. If you don’t believe me, you can read it yourself: Title 49 – Motor Vehicles
There is really only one reason that anyone would be insane enough to ride a motorcycle, and that is that they love to ride a motorcycle. It isn’t worth the risk or the trouble for any other reason.
So this is really, really long. I put it in story form, however, because it is more memorable than quoting title, chapter and section of state code. The facts, however, are all accurate to what state code says in Idaho. If you don’t believe me, you can read it yourself: Title 49 – Motor Vehicles
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your input is appreciated.